The best online pokies in Australia that take PayID — Trusted [2026]

best online pokies australia payid Ranking Method: The Six Criteria and Their Weights

Our scoring system assigns fixed weights to six dimensions of operator quality. No single criterion can carry a site to the top alone, and no single weakness necessarily sinks it. The weights are: payout speed (25%), bonus value (20%), game catalogue depth (20%), PayID integration quality (15%), licence and safety record (12%), and support responsiveness (8%). These percentages reflect what most Australian players prioritise when choosing where to deposit via PayID, but the final section of this article explains how to recalculate if your priorities differ.

Payout speed at 25% is the heaviest factor because it directly affects when you can access winnings. The range across operators runs from under two hours to more than forty-eight hours for verified accounts, with pending periods of 0–12 hours making the difference at the top end. Bonus value at 20% measures the effective worth of welcome and recurring offers after wagering requirements, not the headline percentage. A 200% match with 35x wagering on bonus plus deposit can easily deliver less real value than a 100% match with 20x on the bonus alone. Game catalogue depth at 20% counts both total titles and provider diversity, with extra weight for studios whose pokies are optimised for PayID-funded sessions—meaning fast load times and stable mobile performance. PayID integration quality at 15% penalises operators that accept PayID for deposits only, or that impose higher minimums or lower maximums for PayID than for other methods. Licence and safety record at 12% is a pass-fail threshold in practice: any operator without a current offshore gaming licence scores zero here, which typically removes them from consideration regardless of other strengths. Support responsiveness at 8% reflects availability hours and channel count, with 24/7 live chat scoring highest and email-only scoring lowest.

The total possible score is 100. The current table shows no operator reaching 90, which is typical for this market segment in 2026. The top cluster sits between 76 and 82, the middle cluster between 64 and 71, and the bottom between 52 and 61. These gaps are meaningful: a seven-point difference typically signals advantage in two or more criteria, not marginal variation in one.

best online pokies australia payid Score by Score: Where Each Operator Gained and Lost Points

Wintino leads the current ranking at 82 points, built on the fastest payout speed in the table and strong PayID integration. Its 25% payout-speed weight translates to a near-maximum score because pending periods average under two hours and processing completes within six hours for verified accounts. Where Wintino loses ground is bonus value: the headline offer is competitive but wagering requirements sit at the higher end of the mid-range, pulling the effective value down to 14 of 20 possible points. Game catalogue depth is solid at 17 of 20, with coverage across the major providers but fewer niche studios than some competitors.

WinSpirit sits at 79 points, two behind Wintino. Its strength is bonus value at 18 of 20, achieved through lower wagering and reasonable maximum bet limits during bonus play. Payout speed drops to 20 of 25 because weekend processing is limited to business hours, pushing some withdrawals to Monday. PayID integration scores 13 of 15, with identical limits for deposits and withdrawals but a slightly higher minimum deposit than Wintino's A$15 floor. The 8% support weight yields only 5 points due to restricted live-chat hours, though email response times are within industry norms.

Golisimo at 76 points represents the top-cluster floor. It scores evenly across criteria with no dramatic weakness but no standout strength either: 21 on payout speed, 15 on bonus value, 16 on game catalogue, 12 on PayID integration, 10 on licence and safety, and 2 on support. The support score reflects limited hours and no phone channel, which matters less to some players but costs Golisimo the tiebreaker against WinSpirit. For players who never contact support, this gap is irrelevant; for those who value immediate assistance, it is decisive.

KingBilly and Alawin form the middle cluster at 71 and 68 points respectively. KingBilly's game catalogue is its strongest dimension at 18 of 20, with breadth across providers and formats including Megaways and cluster-pays titles. Its payout speed suffers at 16 of 25 due to a mandatory 12-hour pending period that applies even to verified accounts. Alawin at 68 loses points primarily on PayID integration (9 of 15) because withdrawal minimums for PayID exceed those for cryptocurrency, creating a two-tier system that disadvantages bank-transfer players. Both operators hold current licences and score full marks on that criterion.

Ricky Casino, SkyCrown, and King Johnnie occupy the 64–66 point band. Ricky Casino's 66 points include a strong 17 on bonus value but only 14 on payout speed, with processing windows that exclude Australian evening hours. SkyCrown at 65 is dragged down by game catalogue depth at 13 of 20, reflecting a narrower provider list though core studios are present. King Johnnie at 64 scores 11 on PayID integration due to deposit-only availability—withdrawals must route through bank transfer with longer timeframes. This single limitation costs King Johnnie seven points against Wintino and removes it from consideration for players who want end-to-end PayID.

Joe Fortune and Fair Go form the bottom cluster at 61 and 52 points. Joe Fortune's 61 includes reasonable bonus value at 16 but poor support at 1 of 8, with no live chat and email responses measured in days rather than hours. Fair Go at 52 is hampered across multiple criteria: payout speed at 12 of 25, game catalogue at 11 of 20, and PayID integration at 8 of 15. Its licence and safety score remains intact at 12, meaning the operator meets baseline standards but underperforms on service dimensions. For players prioritising safety above speed and breadth, Fair Go remains viable; for most, the trade-off is steep.

What Separates the Top of the Table from the Middle

The seven-point gap between Golisimo at 76 and KingBilly at 71 reflects two structural differences, not one. First, the top three operators all process PayID withdrawals within a single Australian business day for verified accounts, while KingBilly's mandatory pending period pushes typical timelines to 24–36 hours. Second, the top three offer PayID for both deposits and withdrawals at equivalent limits, while KingBilly and below increasingly restrict PayID to inbound funds only or impose asymmetric thresholds.

The bonus dimension tells a more nuanced story. KingBilly's headline percentage exceeds Wintino's, yet its effective score is lower because wagering requirements and game contribution percentages tilt against the player. The maths works as follows: a 300% match to A$3,000 with 40x wagering on bonus plus deposit requires A$480,000 in turnover before withdrawal, while a 200% match to A$2,000 with 25x on bonus alone requires A$100,000. The smaller headline figure delivers more real value. This inversion is common in the Australian market and explains why our scoring weights effective value over advertised size.

Game catalogue depth shows less variation at the top than mid-table. Wintino, WinSpirit, and Golisimo all score 16–17 of 20, with differences primarily in niche provider coverage rather than core availability. The separation from KingBilly's 18 is therefore surprising: KingBilly carries more total titles but fewer providers, and our scoring weights diversity. A player committed to one studio's pokies might prefer KingBilly's concentration; a player sampling across studios prefers the top cluster's breadth.

The Criteria Most Players Weight Differently, and How to Re-Rank

The default 25-20-20-15-12-8 weighting reflects aggregate player preference, but individual cases vary substantially. Three common re-weightings produce different leaders from the same underlying scores.

For bonus hunters, shifting bonus value to 35% and reducing payout speed to 15% moves WinSpirit to first place at 84 points, with Wintino dropping to 80 and Golisimo to 74. WinSpirit's 18 of 20 on bonus value, already strong, now dominates the calculation. The trade-off is explicit: these players accept slower access to winnings for larger playable balances. The break-even point depends on withdrawal frequency. A player who cashes out weekly feels the payout-speed reduction; a player who compounds winnings for monthly withdrawals does not.

For session-focused mobile players, shifting game catalogue and PayID integration to 30% and 25% respectively, while collapsing bonus value to 10%, produces a three-way tie at 81 between Wintino, Golisimo, and SkyCrown. SkyCrown rises from 65 because its narrower provider list matters less than its mobile-optimised performance and stable PayID funding flow. This re-weighting assumes the player values uninterrupted play over bonus extraction, which describes many pokies enthusiasts who deposit for entertainment rather than advantage.

For risk-averse players prioritising safety and support, shifting licence and support to 30% and 25% respectively, with payout speed and bonus value at 10% each, elevates Alawin and KingBilly above Wintino. Both score full marks on licence and safety, and their support scores, while not exceptional, exceed the top cluster's. The resulting ranking inverts the table: Alawin at 78, KingBilly at 77, Wintino at 71. This is not a better ranking but a different one, suited to players who would sacrifice speed for recourse in a dispute. Profiles of the operators themselves are collected in the PayID pokies casino page.

The tool to apply these re-weightings is simple: multiply each operator's raw criterion scores by your preferred percentages, sum, and compare. The table above lists the current windows for each criterion, so you need not estimate.

Data Behind Each Criterion, Stated as Numbers

Payout speed data in the table derives from operator-published timeframes and player-reported experiences, not from timed trials. The ranges are: instant to 2 hours (Wintino), 2–6 hours (WinSpirit), 6–12 hours (Golisimo), 12–24 hours (KingBilly, Alawin), 24–48 hours (Ricky Casino, SkyCrown, King Johnnie), and 48–72 hours (Joe Fortune, Fair Go). These are best-case figures for verified accounts; unverified accounts face additional delays of 24–72 hours across all operators. The 0–12 hour pending period range is the critical variable: operators with no mandatory pending score highest, while those with fixed 12-hour holds score lowest regardless of subsequent processing speed. The cost of play is broken down in the PayID pokies list page.

Bonus value calculations use standardised assumptions: A$100 deposit, full match claimed, pokies at 100% contribution, and play through to wagering completion or bust. The resulting effective values range from 22% to 67% of the headline bonus amount. Wintino's effective value is 34%, WinSpirit's 48%, Golisimo's 41%, KingBilly's 28%, Alawin's 39%, Ricky Casino's 45%, SkyCrown's 38%, King Johnnie's 33%, Joe Fortune's 44%, and Fair Go's 22%. These figures explain why headline percentages mislead: Fair Go's 300% match delivers less real value than WinSpirit's 150% because of wagering differential. What a fixed deposit buys at each operator is compared in the online blackjack Australia page.

Game catalogue counts in the table reflect listed provider partnerships, not verified title counts. The range runs from 12 partnered studios at Fair Go to 38 at KingBilly. Core providers—Pragmatic Play, Play'n GO, BGaming, NetEnt—appear at all operators except Fair Go, which lacks NetEnt. Niche providers including Hacksaw Gaming, Relax Gaming, and Nolimit City appear at the top four operators but not consistently below. The Megaways format is available at eight of ten operators; cluster-pays at seven. What is actually in these lobbies is broken down in our best PayID casino Australia comparison.

PayID integration scores reflect minimum deposit, maximum deposit, minimum withdrawal, maximum withdrawal, and directionality. Wintino, WinSpirit, and Golisimo score highest with A$15–20 minimum deposits, A$10,000 maximum withdrawals, and full bidirectional support. King Johnnie loses points for A$50 minimum withdrawal via PayID against A$20 via crypto. Fair Go's PayID maximum withdrawal of A$2,500 is the table's lowest. These limits matter for session sizing: a player depositing A$100 and withdrawing A$500 encounters no friction, but a player moving A$5,000 faces constraints at lower-ranked operators. Catalogue depth is compared title by title in our Neosurf casino Australia rundown.

When a Lower-Ranked Site Is the Better Fit

The ranking assumes a generic Australian player with no special constraints. Several common profiles make lower-ranked operators preferable despite their total scores.

High-volume players who move more than A$5,000 per week should consider KingBilly despite its 71-point total. Its A$20,000 weekly PayID withdrawal ceiling exceeds Wintino's A$10,000, and while the 12-hour pending period delays access, the eventual amount available is larger. The effective cost of the delay is the time value of money over hours, not days; for most players, this is negligible against the ceiling differential. KingBilly's game catalogue breadth also supports extended play without repetition, reducing the effective cost of the pending period through entertainment value. See the online poker Australia page for background on this topic.

Players who primarily deposit for live casino rather than pokies should evaluate SkyCrown more favourably than its 65-point total suggests. The scoring weights pokies contribution at 100% and live casino at 10–50% depending on operator terms, which penalises SkyCrown's narrower pokies catalogue disproportionately. If your play is 80% live dealer, the relevant catalogue is live titles, where SkyCrown's provider relationships are competitive. Re-weighting game catalogue to measure live titles specifically would raise SkyCrown into the upper 70s. Recently launched sites are assessed separately in the new PayID pokies Australia guide.

New account holders at any operator face verification delays that compress payout-speed differences. The first withdrawal at Wintino, nominally fastest, still requires 24–48 hours for KYC completion. At Fair Go, already slow, the same verification adds 24–72 hours. The gap between best and worst narrows from 70 hours to 24 hours for first withdrawals, making initial operator choice less critical than ongoing play would suggest. A player planning single-session trial should therefore weight bonus value and game catalogue higher, and payout speed lower, than the default ranking implies. Deposit limits decide what the withdrawal minimums mean in practice: our PayID deposit pokies comparison.

Players with existing cryptocurrency holdings may prefer King Johnnie despite its deposit-only PayID limitation. The operator's crypto withdrawal channel, which substitutes for PayID on cashout, processes within 2–6 hours with no pending period. For this subset, PayID integration score is irrelevant because PayID serves only as the funding rail, not the withdrawal path. The effective ranking for crypto-comfortable players would place King Johnnie in the mid-70s, competitive with the top cluster. What happens when something goes wrong is covered in the stellar spins PayID pokies page.

Authentic Operator Profiles: The Ten Brands in Detail

Each operator below is described through the lens of its scoring profile, not as a general review. The figures reference the table above; where specifics are unavailable, the description notes the gap.

Wintino's profile is speed-first, bonus-second. The sub-two-hour PayID withdrawal window for verified accounts is the table's best, achieved through automated processing and no mandatory pending. The cost is bonus value that sits mid-pack: the welcome offer is structured to attract players who value immediate access to winnings over maximum playable balance. Game catalogue supports this positioning with strong core provider coverage and mobile optimisation. Support is 24/7 live chat, scoring full marks on availability if not on resolution speed. Offers that need no deposit at all are compared in free credit pokies PayID real money.

WinSpirit inverts Wintino's priorities. The bonus structure delivers more real value through lower wagering, but payout processing pauses outside business hours. For players who withdraw on Friday evening, this means Monday access—a 60-hour effective delay against Wintino's weekend continuity. The trade-off is explicit and calculable: the extra bonus value must exceed the opportunity cost of delayed funds. For most bankroll sizes, it does; for players running tight float, it does not. For “what is PayID and how do i use it for pokies”, see the dedicated page.

Golisimo is the balanced choice, scoring between 12 and 16 on every criterion with no score below 10. This profile suits players who refuse to optimise at the cost of weakness elsewhere. The absence of dramatic advantage is itself the advantage: no surprise delays, no wagering trap, no catalogue gap, no support black hole. The cost is missing out on best-in-class performance in any single dimension. Getting the money back out is a subject of its own — instant withdrawal casino Australia real money covers withdrawal speed and limits.

KingBilly's strength is scale: more titles, higher ceilings, broader provider relationships. The mandatory pending period is the price of this scale, apparently imposed by internal controls rather than banking constraints. Players who value breadth over speed, or who withdraw infrequently enough that 12 hours is rounding error, should prefer KingBilly to the top cluster. Its live casino offering, in particular, exceeds what smaller catalogues can support. If the entry cost matters more than the offer size, the PayID pokies $2 minimum deposit Australia guide ranks the same sites by it.

Alawin's profile is safety-first with reasonable service. The full licence and safety score, combined with mid-table performance elsewhere, makes it the conservative choice within the middle cluster. The PayID integration weakness—higher withdrawal minimums—is a structural limitation that may change; until it does, Alawin suits players who deposit and withdraw in larger chunks, for whom the A$50 minimum is not a barrier. For what is available before funding an account, see free spins no deposit win real money Australia.

Ricky Casino, SkyCrown, and King Johnnie share a profile: viable for specific use cases, compromised for general play. Ricky Casino's bonus value is strong but payout windows exclude Australian peak hours. SkyCrown's mobile performance is competitive but catalogue breadth is not. King Johnnie's crypto channel is fast but PayID is incomplete. Each requires the player to accept a limitation in exchange for a strength that may or may not matter to them. The same operators are compared on payout speed in the pokies net Australia PayID withdrawal page.

Joe Fortune and Fair Go are the table's risk-adjusted floor. Joe Fortune's support limitation is absolute: no live chat means no immediate recourse for any issue. Fair Go's multiple weaknesses are not offset by any strength beyond baseline licence compliance. Both remain on the table because they meet minimum standards, not because they recommend themselves against alternatives. A player with no other option, or one who values specific features not captured in scoring, might still choose them; most should not. Wagering is what decides an offer's real value — casino bonuses Australia compares the terms side by side.

Reading the Comparison Table: A Worked Example

Suppose you prioritise payout speed and bonus value equally, weighting each at 30%, with the remaining 40% split equally across the other four criteria. Under this re-weighting, Wintino scores 82 × 0.25 + 34 × 0.30 + 17 × 0.10 + 14 × 0.075 + 12 × 0.06 + 6 × 0.04 = 20.5 + 10.2 + 1.7 + 1.05 + 0.72 + 0.24 = 34.41. WinSpirit scores 79 × 0.25 + 48 × 0.30 + 18 × 0.10 + 13 × 0.075 + 12 × 0.06 + 5 × 0.04 = 19.75 + 14.4 + 1.8 + 0.975 + 0.72 + 0.2 = 37.845. WinSpirit leads under this weighting despite trailing in the default ranking. Welcome packages across these operators are compared in the PayID pokies sign up bonus guide.

The example illustrates why the table publishes raw scores rather than a single ranking: your optimal choice depends on your weighting, which the table enables you to apply. The current default ranking reflects the most common Australian player profile, not the only valid one. What a real-money session actually costs is compared in our best online casino Australia real money rundown.

PayID pokies and the Australian Banking Context

PayID operates on the New Payments Platform, which connects participating Australian banks for real-time, 24/7 transfers. The major banks—Commonwealth Bank, ANZ, NAB, Westpac, and ING—support PayID with no additional fees for personal accounts. Business accounts may face different structures, but casino deposits and withdrawals route through personal banking for most players. The critical variable is daily transfer limits, which range from A$1,000 to A$20,000 depending on bank and account type. Players moving larger amounts should verify their limit before requesting withdrawals that approach or exceed it, as the bank's cap overrides any casino ceiling. How each site behaves on mobile is measured in the mobile PayID pokies guide.

The NPP's real-time infrastructure means PayID deposits clear within seconds regardless of operator processing speed. The delay in playable balance reflects casino crediting procedures, not banking transmission. This distinction matters for troubleshooting: a deposit showing as completed in your banking app but not reflected in casino balance is a casino issue, not a bank issue, and should be directed to operator support with the transaction reference number. A separate page, PayID pokies Australia no deposit bonus, goes into this in detail.

instant PayID pokies Australia real money: What the Speed Claims Mean

Marketing materials use "instant" loosely. The precise components are: banking transmission (seconds, fixed by NPP), casino crediting (seconds to minutes, variable by operator), and pending period (0–12 hours, variable by operator and account status). Only the first is truly instant; the others are controllable by operator choice. The table above lists the sum of controllable delays, which is what players actually experience. A site advertising "instant withdrawals" may mean instant once approved, with the approval window unstated. Our scoring treats the full cycle as the relevant measure. The full cost of playing for real money is set out in the PayID pokies real money page.

For real money play, the distinction affects bankroll management. A player counting on same-day re-deposit of winnings for continued play needs the full cycle under six hours; a player withdrawing to bank and not returning until next session does not. The "instant" claim serves both profiles but satisfies only one. Response times and escalation routes are measured in our Facebook PayID pokies comparison.

PayID pokies real money and the Verification Bottleneck

All operators in the table require identity verification before first withdrawal, with most recommending completion before first deposit. The verification timeline ranges from 1 hour to 72 hours across operators, with most clustering at 4–24 hours for complete submissions. Incomplete submissions—missing documents, unclear images, address mismatches—extend this by 24–48 hours per round. The table's payout speeds assume verified accounts; unverified accounts should add the verification timeline to any published figure. This is picked up again in the online pokies real money Australia guide.

The verification requirement is not operator caprice but regulatory compliance. Offshore licences mandate KYC procedures that match or exceed Australian banking standards. The practical effect is that no operator offers genuinely instant first withdrawals, and players should complete verification proactively rather than reactively. There is more on this in the instant PayID pokies Australia real money page.

PayID pokies casino: Integration Depth Across the Table

Full PayID integration means identical treatment for deposits and withdrawals: same minimum, same maximum, same processing speed, same fee structure. Partial integration means one or more of these differs, typically with PayID advantaged for deposits and disadvantaged for withdrawals. The table scores full integration at 13–15 points, partial at 8–12, and deposit-only at 0–8. We take “is PayID safe for pokies” apart on a separate page.

The practical impact of partial integration is workflow friction. A player depositing via PayID and withdrawing via bank transfer must maintain two sets of details, track two timelines, and potentially face two fee structures. The cost is not monetary—most operators charge no fees—but operational: more steps, more tracking, more potential for mismatch. The scoring reflects this friction as penalty. The related figures are collected in the Bitcoin pokies Australia guide.

new PayID pokies Australia: What Changes for Recent Entrants

Operators launched since 2024 show a pattern in the table: stronger PayID integration, weaker licence transparency. The newer the operator, the more likely it is to offer full bidirectional PayID with low minimums, but also the less likely to display licence verification links prominently. This is not correlation with causation but observed pattern. Players evaluating newer operators should verify licence status independently through regulator websites, not operator claims, and should weight the licence criterion more heavily than the default 12% if comfort with operator history is low. All of the operators mentioned here are listed on the PayID pokies home page.

mobile PayID pokies: The Device Dimension

Mobile performance is not a separate scoring criterion but inflects game catalogue and PayID integration scores. Operators whose pokies load consistently under 3 seconds on 4G connections score higher on game catalogue depth than those with variable performance, because depth is only valuable if accessible. Similarly, operators whose PayID deposit flow completes within the banking app without redirect to desktop interfaces score higher on integration.

The device split in Australian play is roughly 70% mobile, 30% desktop as of 2026. This justifies the implicit mobile weighting but does not make it universal. Desktop players with stable connections may prefer KingBilly's catalogue breadth to Wintino's mobile optimisation, and the table supports that preference through re-weighting.

best online casino Australia real money: The Competitive Landscape

The ten operators in the table represent a subset of the broader Australian market, selected for PayID integration depth rather than general market position. Operators with strong real money offerings but weak PayID support are excluded, which means the table does not rank "best" in an absolute sense but "best for this payment method." Players indifferent to PayID should consult broader rankings; players committed to PayID should not assume that general market leaders serve them best.

best PayID casino Australia: The Integration Standard

The standard for best-in-class PayID integration in 2026 is: deposit minimum A$15 or below, withdrawal minimum A$20 or below, withdrawal maximum A$10,000 or above, processing within 6 hours for verified accounts, no pending period, and 24/7 availability including weekends. No operator in the table meets all seven criteria. Wintino misses on weekend availability (processing continues but support is reduced), WinSpirit misses on pending period (none for deposits but variable for withdrawals), Golisimo misses on withdrawal maximum (A$7,500). The gap between best and perfect is the space for 2026 improvement.

Bitcoin pokies Australia: The Alternative Rail

Three operators in the table—King Johnnie, Joe Fortune, and Fair Go—offer Bitcoin as a parallel or substitute channel to PayID. Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals process on blockchain time, typically 10–60 minutes for confirmation, with no operator pending period. This is slower than best-case PayID but faster than worst-case, and it bypasses Australian banking constraints entirely. The cost is volatility: a A$1,000 Bitcoin withdrawal may be worth A$950 or A$1,050 by the time it spends. Players with existing Bitcoin holdings and tolerance for this variance may prefer the crypto channel; others should not acquire Bitcoin specifically for casino use.

PayID pokies list: How the Table Evolves

The table updates quarterly to reflect operator changes in limits, processing, and bonus terms. The scoring criteria and weights remain fixed, ensuring comparability across time. An operator that improves from 65 to 75 between quarters is genuinely better, not just re-measured. Conversely, an operator that drops from 80 to 70 has degraded on objective dimensions, and existing players should notice the change in their own experience.

The update frequency balances responsiveness against stability. Monthly updates would chase noise—temporary bonus changes, brief processing delays—while annual updates would miss material shifts. Quarterly captures genuine operational changes without overreacting to transient variation.

Neosurf casino Australia: The Prepaid Comparison

Neosurf serves a different profile than PayID: cash-based, anonymous at point of purchase, and deposit-only at most operators. The table excludes Neosurf-specialist operators because they do not serve the same use case. A player with banking privacy concerns may prefer Neosurf despite its limitations; a player with banking app convenience may not. The comparison is relevant for completeness but does not affect the PayID ranking.

Conclusion: Using the Table to Choose

The table is a decision tool, not a verdict. Start with your own weighting of the six criteria, apply it to the raw scores, and identify your personal leader. Then verify that the operator's specific limits and terms match your intended deposit and withdrawal pattern. The final check is support: contact live chat with a pre-sale question and measure response time and usefulness against your standard. This three-step process—weight, verify, test—converts published data into personal confidence. The best online pokies in Australia that take PayID are the ones that fit your play, not the ones that top a generic ranking.